Los Angeles Personal Injury Attorneys
Kiesel Law LLP is a nationally recognized consumer litigation firm specializing in complex litigation, class action, catastrophic injury, consumer fraud, pharmaceutical and medical device injury, unfair business practices, construction defect, truck accident and environmental litigation.
City of Los Angeles Files Lawsuit Against PricewaterhouseCoopers
PricewaterhouseCoopers fraudulently misrepresented its ability to implement a new billing system for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in order to secure a $70-million municipal contract and subsequently failed to deliver, according to a civil lawsuit filed Friday by the city attorney’s office. According to the city attorney’s complaint, PricewaterhouseCoopers “overstated its knowledge, expertise and skills necessary to convert” the existing system and launch a new software platform.
The alleged misrepresentation began after the L.A. utility issued a request for proposals in an effort to modernize its nearly 40 years old customer care and billing system. As a result of PricewaterhouseCoopers’s lack of skills and experience to perform the work stipulated in the contract, the LADWP’s system was unable to properly tally service bills for tens of thousands of customers.
Kiesel Law LLP is acting as special counsel for the City of Los Angeles.
Helen Zukin Selected 2015 Top 100 Women Lawyers in California
Kiesel Law LLP is proud to announce that the Daily Journal has selected partner Helen Zukin as one of the top 100 Women Lawyers in California for 2015. This award is presented to Helen to honor her victories in the courtroom and her advocacy for the advancement of women in law.
Paul Kiesel and the entire firm congratulate Helen on receiving this award.
Zoom and the Court System: Q&A with Attorney Paul Kiesel
In the past few years, Zoom has seen truly explosive growth, reaching over 40 million participants, collectively communicating for over one billion minutes. We have made the world a little smaller, helped reduce the worldwide emissions footprint, and served a continually-growing customer base in education, technology, medicine, and a variety of other areas. Among those customers, we find Paul Kiesel, attorney at law, founder of Kiesel Law LLP, and President Elect of the Los Angeles Bar Association.
We’ve recently run a case study on Mr. Kiesel, and that is when we learned of an untapped part of the market that could certainly make use of video to fulfill its purpose more efficiently: the court system. We decided to speak with Paul Kiesel in-depth about the prospective use of video in the courtroom — and even discussed previous attempts to use it — to understand how Zoom can play a role in a system that, at the very least, appears to require a push forward with proper and versatile video technology. Here’s our interview:
Zoom: What are your personal views on video communications tools being used in the courtroom?
Paul Kiesel: Video communication in the courtroom is the natural extension of technology and it assists our judicial system in finding a way to create better connectivity and improve environmental costs associated with travel, time, and space. To me, it is the natural progression from the written word to telephones, and now, to using video as a way to interact with people.
Multi-Million Dollar Settlement Reached
After Ground Breaking Trial
A multi-million dollar settlement has been obtained by Paul Kiesel on behalf of clients Nathaniel T. and Gary R. after a jury verdict shattered a decade’s old practice of magazine clearing houses classifying salespeople as independent contractors in order to escape liability. The 12 person jury unanimously decided that the magazine clearing house, Atlantic Circulation Inc., was the employer of Nathaniel and Gary, who traveled from town to town knocking on doors selling magazines for the exclusive benefit of the magazine clearing house. Prior to this trial, magazine clearing houses in California and across the country enjoyed the benefits of the employee/employer relationship without any of the responsibilities of the relationship. These magazine clearing houses employ thousands of young men and women working up to 12 hours a day exclusively selling magazine subscriptions on behalf of the clearing houses. In the case of Atlantic Circulation, Inc., the company exhibited total control over the plaintiffs including: where they could sell, which magazines they could sell and which sales pitch would be used.
Riverside Superior Court, location of trial
Atlantic Circulation Inc. greatly benefited from this employer/employee relationship, but when Nathaniel and Gary were seriously injured during their work for Atlantic Circulation, the company refused to provide any benefits, medical or otherwise, to them. Instead, Atlantic Circulation insisted that the young men were, at most, independent contractors who were not entitled to any compensation at all.
“Thanks to the outstanding decision reached by this jury, magazine clearing house corporations will be held accountable when young men and women are injured during the course and scope of their employment for that company”, according to Paul Kiesel. “This is not only a big, life altering verdict for our two brave clients, who were so seriously injured, but is a victory for all people who were, until now, in a relationship with corporations where the company held all the control and benefits, without any of the potential liability to those who worked for them”.
Paul Kiesel Named to the Daily Journal’s 2014 Top 100 List
The Daily Journal has recognized Paul Kiesel for his outstanding work both in the courtroom and on behalf of the courts by selecting him as one of the Top 100 Lawyers in California. The Journal lauded Paul’s efforts as one of the leaders of the consolidated litigation against Fedex Corporation. This litigation stems from the tragic crash that took the lives of five students and 3 adults when a Fedex tractor-trailer crashed into a bus full of students on their way to a college tour.
Paul has also been singled out for his work as Co-Chair of the Open Courts Collation, a bipartisan committee of attorneys and other stakeholders throughout California, including the Chamber of Commerce, who are advocating for greater funding of the civil justice system.
Paul Kiesel said, “I am honored to be selected as one of the top 100 lawyers in the state of California, where there are over 225,000 practicing attorneys.”
Federal Express Bus Crash Lawsuit Filed
A wrongful death action has been filed by Kiesel Law LLP against Federal Express on behalf of the family of Ismael Jimenez.
Paul Kiesel stated at the May 20, 2014, news conference that the lawsuit is on behalf of Ismael Jimenez, 18, an aspiring college student and artist. Ismael and other high school seniors were headed north for a tour of Humboldt State University when the bus was struck head-on by the FedEx truck. “Ismael sacrificed his life to save the lives of other students on the bus,” noted Kiesel. “This was the Bus Full of Dreams, because these were disadvantaged children who had excelled in school and were the first in their families to attend college.” “Liability rests first and foremost with Federal Express. Federal Express owned, maintained and ran that tractor unit,” said Kiesel. “By bringing this claim now, it gives the family the legal right to determine why this tragic crash happened.” Ismael Jimenez rushed to the front of the bus as it was filling with smoke, broke out a window and helped lift others to safety. Evelin Jimenez, Ismael’s sister, said, “He could have saved his own life, but he put the lives of others first. He is a Hero.”
$4,014,069.00 Verdict on Behalf of Tractor-Trailer Collision Victim
“And now you know why we are here” were the words that attorney Paul R. Kiesel used in rebuttal at the close of a ten day trial in Santa Rosa. Paul was reminding the jury of the defense lawyer’s opening statement two weeks earlier when the Defendant trucking company admitted full responsibility for the crash and it’s lawyer said “We want to make it right”. This personal injury trial focused on injuries that the Plaintiff sustained when his stopped pickup truck was rear-ended by the Defendant’s 45,000 pound Tractor-Trailer that was traveling at 45 miles per hour at the time of the impact. The driver of the pickup truck, who was 22 years of age at the time of the crash, suffered Compression Fractures of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Thoracic vertebrae, was confined to a body cast for 9 months, has undergone (and continues to need) post-accident medical care and treatment and he has and – for the rest of his life – will continue to experience a lifetime of daily constant pain. However, as the trial progressed, it became apparent to the jury that there was a sizeable gap between defense lawyer’s words and their true intentions. Not only did the defense lawyer disagree with the Victim’s expert witnesses during the trial, which included treating physicians from the Mayo Clinic and St. Jude’s Medical Center, the defense attorney ended up greatly disagreeing with the defense’s very own expert witnesses as to the costs of that lifetime of future medical care and the lost earning capacity that this young man sustained due to the Defendant’s own (admitted) negligence. Rather than “making it right” it became obvious to the jury that the defense was only attempting to minimize, reduce and avoid financial responsibility for the crippling injuries that its driver’s negligent operation of the Big-Rig caused. Because the defense lawyer and the defense of the case didn’t do so, it was left to the jury to “make it right,” and they did by returning this sizeable verdict on the Victim’s behalf.